George Soros (Soros Fund Management Founder) – A Capitalist on “The Capitalist Threat” (Aug 2015)

Chapters

Abstract

A Comprehensive Analysis of George Soros’ Views on Capitalism and Its Future

Navigating Capitalism’s Complex Currents: Soros’ Insightful Critique and Vision for Reform

In a thought-provoking discourse, George Soros, a well-known capitalist, delves deep into the intricacies and pitfalls of laissez-faire capitalism, highlighting its inadequacies in serving society’s broader needs. Soros, while defending against accusations of hypocrisy, elucidates the dire need for international regulation and political wisdom to steer the global capitalist system towards stability. Amidst the ongoing financial crisis and its far-reaching consequences, he calls for a collective effort from capitalist leaders to modify the system’s inherent flaws. Soros underscores the necessity for an attitudinal change towards cooperation and shared responsibility, urging institutional reforms to address growing social tensions, widening economic disparities, and the escalating political and economic challenges on a global scale.

—

Soros’ Critique of Laissez-Faire Capitalism

George Soros critically examines laissez-faire capitalism, pointing out its failure to address societal needs effectively. He argues that market imperfections cannot cater to the common interest alone, and the unchecked expansion of market forces threatens democratic societies. Soros also highlights that the ideology of laissez-faire capitalism, which emphasizes individual self-interest and leaves everything to market forces, has negative consequences.

Defense Against Hypocrisy Accusations

Soros defends himself against hypocrisy accusations, distinguishing between his roles as a capitalist and a human being. He emphasizes the pursuit of truth and understanding over defending personal interests, advocating for money to serve meaningful purposes. Soros believes that criticism of his views is often exaggerated and that the positive reactions to his stance outweigh the negative ones.

Political Process Failures

Highlighting the lag in political processes in keeping pace with the globalized economy, Soros points to the rise of state authoritarianism and oppression. He laments the dominance of market mechanisms in areas they shouldn’t pervade due to political inadequacies. Soros emphasizes the need to strengthen existing international institutions and potentially create new ones to address global issues effectively.

International Regulation Necessity

Soros advocates for international regulation to maintain the stability of the financial system. He recognizes the crucial role of institutions like the IMF and the World Bank in this context, despite applauding the reduction of state powers. Soros believes that the power of individual states has diminished, leading to a lack of international political oversight. However, he expresses support for the reduced power of authoritarian states, as he sees them as instruments of oppression.

Financial Crisis and Consequences

The ongoing financial crisis, as Soros notes, poses significant risks like a financial meltdown and banking crisis. He stresses the importance of political and economic stability, warning against protectionism that could worsen the situation. Soros predicts a doubling of the US trade deficit in the coming year, which could lead to increased protectionist sentiment and restrictions on imports. He emphasizes the need for imports to allow debtor countries to pay their debts and avoid a breakdown in the system.

Political Wisdom and Cooperation Imperative

Soros emphasizes the need for political wisdom and global cooperation to address the current crisis and prevent future ones. He acknowledges the necessity of modifying capitalism but points out the complexity involved in determining specific changes. Soros believes that change can occur through gradual shifts in attitudes and policies rather than violent upheavals. He advocates for voting and participating in the political system to express dissatisfaction and bring about change, citing the example of the immigration legislation, which disenfranchised legal immigrants, as an instance where the political process can work to correct injustices.

Optimism for Containment and Correction

Despite the worrying situation, Soros remains optimistic about containing the crisis and the self-correcting nature of the system. He stresses preventing import restrictions to aid debtor countries. Soros acknowledges that economic benefits at the center of global capitalism might exacerbate social costs, widening the gap between rich and poor. He points out the differential impact on various industries and job sectors.

Role of Capitalist Leaders

Soros calls on capitalist leaders to collaboratively address the systemic issues of capitalism. He highlights the complexity in determining the specific changes required for its reform. Soros emphasizes the need for a fundamental shift in attitudes towards cooperation and shared responsibility. He suggests that institutional reforms are necessary, including strengthening or creating new international institutions.

Attitudinal Change and Institutional Reforms

Soros stresses the need for a fundamental shift in attitudes towards cooperation and shared responsibility. He suggests that institutional reforms are necessary, including strengthening or creating new international institutions. Soros believes that correction of societal issues should come through the political process rather than revolutionary means. He emphasizes the importance of making the political system function properly and advocates for dialogue and collective citizen action.

Political Turmoil and Economic Implications

Soros predicts significant political turmoil, particularly in Asia, and changes in China due to the financial crisis. He notes potential economic benefits for the global capitalist system’s center, like stable inflation and stimulated economies through lower interest rates. Soros warns that lower interest rates may exacerbate social tensions by increasing the gap between lower-paid workers and skilled workers in service industries.

Social Tensions and Widening Inequality

Soros acknowledges that economic benefits at the center of global capitalism might exacerbate social costs, widening the gap between rich and poor. He points out the differential impact on various industries and job sectors. Soros expresses concern that the growing tensions between the haves and the have-nots, both domestically and internationally, have the potential to cause significant instability.

International Setting and Global Concerns

Highlighting his concern for the international setting, Soros emphasizes addressing global challenges, considering the widening division between the haves and have-nots as a systemic issue. Soros is more concerned with the international setting and the potential for tension between haves and have-nots on a global scale. He points out that the United States is in a privileged position compared to other countries but acknowledges domestic issues that need to be addressed.

Economic Disparities and Political Implications

Soros stresses the widening gap between the wealthy and the underprivileged, fearing heightened international tensions. He urges the United States to recognize these global tensions and address domestic inequities. Soros highlights the excessive influence of money in politics, which he believes undermines the functioning of the political process. He emphasizes the need for campaign finance reform to reduce the role of money in elections.

Political Process and Societal Change

Advocating for a functional political process, Soros emphasizes the power of voting and leadership transformation. He cites examples where political processes have corrected societal issues. Soros criticizes the laissez-faire ideology that leaves everything to market forces, arguing that it has negative consequences. He observes a change in attitudes among professionals, particularly in the medical field, due to the adverse effects of market-driven healthcare systems.

Critique of Laissez-Faire Ideology

Soros criticizes the dominance of market-driven motives, especially in fields like healthcare, calling for a more balanced approach that integrates social and ethical considerations. He sees the possibility of new coalitions between patients and doctors to challenge the market-driven healthcare system.

Preference for Non-Revolutionary Change

Despite his expertise in revolutions, Soros favors non-revolutionary, political processes for societal change, advocating for dialogue and collective citizen action. Soros believes that the political process can work to correct injustices, citing the example of the immigration legislation, which disenfranchised legal immigrants, as an instance where the political process can work to correct injustices.

Response to Criticism

Soros addresses criticism of being a class traitor, suggesting that such perceptions are overblown and highlighting the positive reactions to his stance. He dismisses the notion that he is considered a traitor to his class, suggesting that the criticism is exaggerated.

—

Additional Information:

– For a complete transcript of Soros’ insights, a check or money order of $4 can be sent to The Open Mind, P.O. Box 7977, FDR Station, New York, New York, 10150.

– Program Transcript:

The transcript of the program can be obtained by sending a check or money order for $4 to The Open Mind, P.O. Box 7977, FDR Station, New York, New York, 10150.

– Program Production:

The production of The Open Mind has been made possible by grants from various foundations and organizations, including the Rosalind P. Walter Foundation, the M. Wiener Foundation of New Jersey, the Thomas and Teresa Malachy Foundation, the Center for Educational Outreach and Innovation at Teachers College, Columbia University, and the William T. Grant Foundation. Corporate support is provided by Ruta Fitts.

Notes by: Alkaid