George Soros (Soros Fund Management Founder) – Charlie Rose Interview (1994)
Chapters
Abstract
A Philanthropic Journey: George Soros’ Pursuit of an Open Society
In the dynamic landscape of global politics and philanthropy, few figures have been as influential and contentious as George Soros. This article explores Soros’ evolution from a financier to a philanthropist, his deep-seated convictions about open societies, and the implications of his actions and views on the global stage.
The Genesis of an Open Society Advocate
Soros’ experiences during the Nazi occupation of Hungary and the subsequent communist regime greatly shaped his worldview. Witnessing the horrors of authoritarianism, Soros developed a lasting commitment to open societies, where democratic institutions, free markets, and diverse viewpoints thrive. This commitment later became the cornerstone of his philanthropic activities.
Shift in Focus: From Eastern Europe to Global Philanthropy
Initially, Soros dedicated significant resources to fostering democratic transformations in Eastern Europe, investing approximately $1 billion in the region by 1994. However, his focus has since broadened to global philanthropy, with the Soros Foundation playing a pivotal role in these efforts.
The Missed Opportunity in Eastern Europe and Beyond
Despite his efforts, Soros believes that the transformation of Eastern Europe into an open society was hindered by insufficient global support. He underscores the need for sustained external assistance and a long-term commitment to establishing open societies, not just in Eastern Europe but worldwide.
Condemning Western Inaction and Embracing Fallibility
Soros is critical of the West’s passive approach to crises, particularly in Bosnia, and advocates for a more proactive stance in protecting civilians. His philosophy embraces fallibility and uncertainty, allowing for adaptive strategies in both financial and philanthropic ventures.
Russia: A Case Study in Fragility and Failure
Soros expresses concern about Russia’s instability, citing poor economic conditions, diminishing support for reformers, and the failures of reform attempts due to various factors, including incompetence and insufficient Western support. He warns of potential civil war and the rise of nationalism, which could undermine regional stability.
Supporting Reform and Long-Term Projects
Despite challenges, Soros advocates for continued support of reform, emphasizing long-term projects in education, science, and open society building. He believes these efforts are crucial for Russia’s future stability.
Navigating Power and Responsibility
Soros acknowledges the weight of his influence as a successful investor and philanthropist. He approaches his role with caution and responsibility, understanding the potential impact of his decisions on global markets and economies.
The Lost Opportunity in Eastern Europe
Soros believes that the West missed an opportunity to expand the sway of open society to Eastern Europe due to insufficient support and belief in the concept. He emphasizes that open society is a complex form of organization and cannot be achieved quickly without substantial external assistance.
Russia’s Fragile Stability
Soros expresses concern about Russia’s fragile political and economic stability, noting the weak position of reformers and the potential for civil war.
Bosnia and the Humanitarian Crisis
Soros criticizes the inaction of Western countries and the United States in protecting civilians in Bosnia. He argues that the troops’ engagement terms make them part of a system oppressing Sarajevo’s population. Soros condemns the failure to take a stand against aggression and genocide and calls for the use of force to protect civilians.
Soros’s Journey: From Holocaust Survivor to Philanthropic Champion of Open Societies
George Soros, born in Hungary, lived through the Nazi occupation during World War II. To survive, he adopted false names and faced constant danger of deportation and possible death. His family survived due to his father’s foresight in taking evasive action.
Soros’s experiences during the Holocaust and under the communist regime shaped his belief in the importance of living in an open society. He developed a deep appreciation for democracy, freedom, and individual rights.
Soros’s Investment Success and Philanthropic Turn
Soros achieved significant financial success as an investor, generating an average 35% return over 26 years. In 1979, upon reaching a certain level of wealth, he began to question the purpose of his wealth. He decided to use his resources to promote open societies and support democratic values worldwide.
Soros’ Views on Israel
Soros expresses his opposition to Israel’s policies, particularly the settlement of the West Bank and the policies of the previous Likud government. He attributes his opposition to his belief that he would have been opposed to these policies if he had lived in Israel.
Soros’ Reasons for Remaining Silent
Soros explains that he refrained from publicly expressing his views on Israel because he felt it was appropriate for him to do so only if he lived in Israel.
Soros’ Sympathy for Israel
Despite his criticism of Israeli policies, Soros emphasizes his sympathy for Israel and his excitement about the country’s commitment to finding peace.
Soros’ Desired Legacy
Soros expresses his aspiration to be remembered for exploring the limits of possibilities and making the most of his life.
Conclusion of the Interview
Charlie Rose thanks Soros for the interview and expresses his appreciation for Soros’ commitment to utilizing funds and listening to what is happening on the ground.
Continued Conversations and Future Directions
As the conversation with Soros continues, there is a keen interest in exploring his thoughts on Asia and other global issues, reflecting the ongoing relevance and influence of his ideas and actions.
In summary, George Soros’ journey from a financier to a philanthropist advocating for open societies has left a significant mark on the global stage. His experiences, beliefs, and actions provide a compelling case study in navigating the complexities of global politics and philanthropy.
Notes by: Hephaestus