Vitalik Buterin (Ethereum Co-founder) – Polygon zkEVM Launch (Mar 2023)
Chapters
Abstract
The Evolving Landscape of Ethereum’s Layer 2 Solutions: A Dive into ZKVM and Its Impact
The initiation of the first transaction on Polygon ZKVM by Vitalik Buterin, not only symbolizes a technical milestone but also encapsulates the evolving landscape of Ethereum’s Layer 2 solutions. With the introduction of ZKVM, Ethereum steps into a new era where scalability, security, and practicality converge, offering a promising future for decentralized applications. This article explores the significance, challenges, and future prospects of ZKVM in Ethereum’s scaling journey, reflecting on the emotional reactions of key figures, the maturity of the Layer 2 ecosystem, and the nuanced approach of Polygon’s ZKVM implementation.
Expanding on Main Ideas:
1. Transaction Initiation and Details: The first transaction on Polygon ZKVM, executed by Vitalik Buterin, was a defining moment that showcased the practical application of Layer 2 solutions.
_Response 1_: Vitalik’s symbolic transaction on the Ethereum Knowledge Base Machine (EKBM) successfully sent 0.005 ETH using Metamask with a YATS limit of 6.042.
2. Emotional Reactions: The launch was met with enthusiasm and optimism, indicating a collective belief in the potential of Layer 2 solutions to revolutionize Ethereum.
_Response 2_: Vitalik expresses joy and emphasizes the significance of scalability for Ethereum’s growth. Jordi feels fulfilled and eager for future developments, viewing the launch as a milestone in Ethereum’s scaling journey.
3. Significance of Layer 2 Solutions: ZKVMs are essential in addressing Ethereum’s scalability challenges, emphasizing a balanced approach to secure and practical applications.
_Response 2_: Vitalik reiterates the importance of scaling as a long-standing challenge for Ethereum, driven by the increasing cost of mainnet transactions. He highlights the benefits of decentralized approaches over centralized ones.
4. Maturity of Layer 2 Ecosystem: The shift from theoretical frameworks to practical, proof-based systems marks 2023 as a year of significant progress in Layer 2 technologies.
_Response 2_: Vitalik sees 2023 as the year for the Layer 2 ecosystem to mature, emphasizing the progress made by Polygon in improving its security model.
5. ZKVM as a Milestone: The launch of ZKVM is celebrated as a significant step forward but is also recognized as the starting point of a longer journey toward scalable applications.
6. Benefits of ZKVM for Ethereum: ZKVM is poised to make Ethereum more user-friendly by reducing costs and enhancing scalability, paving the way for more decentralized applications.
7. Challenges and Future Steps: The ongoing development in the Layer 2 ecosystem faces hurdles in security, interoperability, and user experience, requiring continued innovation.
8. ZKVM Types and Polygon’s Approach: Polygon’s ZKVM is a Type 3 solution, with plans to evolve towards Type 2 for better integration with Ethereum’s execution layer.
_Response 3_: Polygon’s ZK-VM is classified as Type 3 according to Vitalik’s recent blog post, with plans to evolve towards Type 2 by implementing pre-compiled smart contracts.
9. Nomenclature and Considerations: The classification of ZKVM types brings clarity to the field, highlighting the distinct advantages and trade-offs of each type.
_Response 3_: Jordi emphasizes the need to address limitations and make ZK-VMs accessible globally, focusing on security, usability, and scaling. Mihailo raises questions about the nomenclature of ZK-VMs and the potential for further exploration.
10. Polygon’s ZKVM Journey: Focused on data availability, Polygon aims for a gradual transition to a more Ethereum-centric execution model.
11. Ethereum Compatibility and Optimization: The balance between maintaining Ethereum compatibility and optimizing for efficiency in ZKVL implementations.
12. User Experience and Compatibility: ZK-EVMs maintain compatibility with Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) tooling, enhancing user experience and facilitating a smooth transition for developers and users.
13. Configurable ZKVM: The ideal ZKVM implementation allows for configuration to support various types, allowing users to customize settings for performance while maintaining desired compatibility levels with Ethereum.
14. ZKVM Implementation Considerations: Layer 2 ZKVM implementations can benefit from Stark-friendly hash functions for efficiency, though this may lead to compatibility differences with Layer 1. Layer 1 ZKVMs may adopt these optimizations in the future.
15. ZKVL Implementation: Developing ZKVL implementations with varying pre-compiles based on project-specific compatibility and efficiency needs is feasible, allowing for the transition from higher to lower types and leveraging existing code.
16. Lessons from Ethereum’s zkEVM: Optimizing for Ethereum compatibility in zkEVM implementation posed challenges, leading to innovative techniques that outperformed non-Ethereum-compatible alternatives. Incremental progress is necessary, with some components remaining similar despite differences.
17. Vitalik’s Proposed Roadmap for ZK-AVM Roll-ups: The roadmap emphasizes security and responsible implementation, with three stages of increasing decentralization.
_Response 6_: Stage Zero involves full trust in a small committee for transaction overrides, providing a safety net but relying on human intervention.
_Response 6_: Stage One introduces 75% human approval for overrides, striking a balance between human oversight and code autonomy. Aiming for the Layer 2 ecosystem to move to at least Stage One in 2023.
_Response 6_: Stage Two signifies full trust in the code, allowing for an emergency switch in case of catastrophic bugs.
_Response 6_: Stage One is crucial for decentralization, enabling proof systems to have real power while allowing error correction and human intervention.
18. Achievability and Adoption: Stage One should be achievable for many ZK-EVM and Optimistic EVM projects in 2023. Projects like Arbitrum are working towards opening up their proof systems, indicating progress towards more decentralized roll-up solutions.
_Response 7_:
Polygon CKBN: Vitalik’s Perspective and Stage One Security Goals
Vitalik’s Thoughts on Polygon CKBN:
– Vitalik expressed his desire for Polygon to join the stage one camp with a fully functional proof system that has practical implications.
– He emphasized the importance of setting high security standards while allowing for a gradual transition to full safety and permissionlessness.
Polygon’s Current Status and Roadmap:
– Polygon CKVM is currently stage one compliant, with additional security measures being implemented.
– Forced transactions will be enabled in a few weeks, and the skill switch will be removed once the team is confident in the security.
– The time log for upgradability will be increased from 10 to 30 days.
Mihailo’s Perspective:
– Mihailo agreed with Vitalik’s assessment of Polygon CKBN as stage one and supported the gradual transition to full safety and permissionlessness.
Closing Messages:
– Jordi encouraged developers and users to try out Polygon CKBN, highlighting its simplicity and ease of use.
– Grace acknowledged the insightful discussion and balanced perspectives from both Mihailo and Jordi.
Notes by: MatrixKarma