Graham Allison (Harvard University Professor) – Thucydides Trap | Munich Security Conference (Feb 2020)
Chapters
Abstract
The Thucydides Trap: Understanding the Dynamics of Power Shifts in the US-China Relationship
Abstract
In a world where the balance of power is constantly shifting, the concept of the Thucydides Trap provides a framework for comprehending the dynamics between rising and ruling powers. Graham Allison’s analysis, inspired by historical conflicts, delves into the complexities of the contemporary US-China relationship. This article explores Allison’s insights, shedding light on the challenges and opportunities that shape this evolving geopolitical landscape.
—
The Genesis of Thucydides Trap: A Scholar’s Quest
Graham Allison’s exploration of international politics, particularly the US-China dynamic, mirrors the world’s growing recognition of China’s global influence. His concept of the Thucydides Trap, influenced by the ancient historian’s observations, frames the potential clash between a rising China and the established United States. This theoretical construct has sparked discussions and debates, highlighting the nuances and implications of this power shift.
Exploring the Trap: A Detailed Analysis
Allison’s extensive background in international relations, including his leadership roles at Harvard’s Kennedy School and the Belfer Center, lends credibility to his analysis. His government experience, including serving as Assistant Secretary of Defense for Policy and Plans, further underscores his expertise. Allison’s contributions to the field are notable, with works like “The Essence of Decision” and “Nuclear Terrorism” gaining widespread recognition.
At the core of the Thucydides Trap lies the structural tension that arises when an ascending power challenges the status quo. Allison’s in-depth analysis in “Destined for War” illuminates historical instances, drawing parallels with the current US-China scenario. He emphasizes the need for conscious efforts, through dialogue and cooperation, to avoid the historical pattern of conflict, underscoring that conflict is not an inevitable outcome.
Thucydides’ Trap: Insights from Historical Examples of Rising and Ruling Powers
Thucydides proposed that when a rising power threatens to displace a ruling power, conflict is likely. Of 16 historical cases, 12 resulted in war, indicating a high potential for conflict. The structural dynamics of this relationship create a pattern of alarm and extreme danger.
Factors Contributing to War: Misperception and misunderstanding between the rising and ruling powers can lead to vulnerability. Events or incidents that would otherwise be manageable can trigger a vicious cycle of reactions, potentially leading to war. World War I exemplifies how a seemingly minor event (the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand) can escalate into a devastating conflict.
Relevance to the US-China Relationship: The US-China relationship is often seen as a modern illustration of Thucydides’ Trap. Despite the desire for peace on both sides, the potential for conflict remains due to the structural dynamics of the relationship. The risk of war is heightened by the possibility of misperceptions and misunderstandings between the two powers.
—
Historical Precedents and Contemporary Relevance
Allison’s examination of 16 historical cases, where a rising power confronted an established one, reveals a pattern where most led to conflict. This insight is particularly pertinent to understanding the dynamics at play in the US-China relationship. The structural tensions, fueled by misperceptions and vulnerabilities to unexpected events, create a precarious situation where even minor incidents could escalate into significant confrontations.
World War I: A Lesson in Escalation
The outbreak of World War I serves as a stark reminder of how minor events, like the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, can trigger a cascade of reactions leading to large-scale conflict. This historical episode exemplifies the dangers inherent in the Thucydides Trap, highlighting the necessity for vigilant management of international relations to prevent similar escalations in the contemporary context.
Nuclear Stakes and the Taiwan Question
In the nuclear age, the stakes of a potential US-China conflict are exponentially higher. Allison’s emphasis on the catastrophic consequences of nuclear war and the complex issue of Taiwan’s status add layers of gravity to the discourse. His experience in the Reagan Pentagon brings a sobering perspective to the insanity of nuclear warfare, further accentuating the generational gap in war experience among current military personnel.
Consequences of Nuclear War, Impacts of War on Populations, and Avoiding Conflict Triggers: Nuclear war between the US and China could result in no human survivors. Many current military personnel lack experience with large-scale wars that have resulted in significant American casualties. If Taiwan were to make a strong push for independence, China would likely react aggressively to prevent it. The US would face a difficult decision on whether to intervene and support Taiwan. Unintended events, like the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, can trigger a chain of reactions leading to war. It is crucial to study and discuss potential triggers to avoid crises and manage them effectively. Communication between the US and China is essential to prevent crises and establish circuit breakers in case of escalating tensions.
—
Managing Unintended Crises
Allison’s insights extend to the importance of averting and managing crises effectively. His emphasis on establishing “circuit breakers” for de-escalation in the US-China relationship is a critical point, suggesting that foresight and strategic dialogue are key to preventing inadvertent escalations.
Learning from Past Cases
The dialogue between Speaker 00 and Allison brings historical cases to the forefront, highlighting the significance of learning from the past. The example of Spain and Portugal’s rivalry and the Cold War experience offer valuable lessons in managing great power relations, underscoring the need for caution and strategic thinking in the US-China context.
Kennedy’s Legacy: A Guide for Modern Times
President Kennedy’s handling of the Cuban Missile Crisis and his subsequent transformation provide a template for contemporary leaders. His shift towards a policy of coexistence and constraint, manifested in his American University speech, serves as a guiding principle for managing the US-China relationship. This approach, recognizing that a nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought, is crucial for establishing a framework for peaceful competition and conflict avoidance.
—
Conclusion
The Thucydides Trap, as conceptualized by Graham Allison, offers a profound lens through which we can view the intricacies of the US-China relationship. It calls for a nuanced understanding of historical patterns, the recognition of the catastrophic implications of conflict in the nuclear age, and the adoption of strategic measures to prevent escalation. In echoing the lessons from history and Kennedy’s transformative approach, this framework not only highlights the risks inherent in power shifts but also illuminates the path towards a more stable and cooperative international order.
Supplemental Insights:
– Similarities Between Historical Rivalries and Current US-China Relations: Thucydides’s analysis of historical rivalries provides valuable insights into the potential for conflict between rising and established powers.
– Historical Cases and Their Relevance: While the historical cases studied by Thucydides occurred before the nuclear age, they still provide valuable lessons for understanding the dynamics of rising power challenges.
– Four Cases of Non-War Outcomes: Out of 16 historical cases of rising power challenges, only four did not result in war.
– The Case of Spain and Portugal: In the 16th century, Pope Alexander VI mediated between Spain and Portugal, dividing the world into their respective spheres of influence, thus avoiding conflict.
– The Cold War as a Framework: The US and the Soviet Union managed to avoid war during the Cold War through a combination of internal contradictions within the Soviet system, US resistance, and efforts to undermine the regime.
– China’s Rise and the US Perspective: Some Chinese believe that the US should follow the example of Britain in the 20th century and recede from the Western Hemisphere and Asia.
– China’s Growing Power and US Concerns: China’s military buildup and economic growth have encroached on US positions and prerogatives, leading to tensions between the two countries.
– Thucydides’s Perspective: Thucydides would likely see the current US-China relationship as a potential for a grand collision.
– The Nuclear Age: The presence of nuclear weapons in the modern context makes the situation even more dangerous and complicates the potential for war.
– John F. Kennedy’s Reflection on the Cuban Missile Crisis: Kennedy recognized the grave danger of nuclear war during the Cuban Missile Crisis and was willing to take risks to prevent a catastrophe.
– Kennedy’s Call for Adaptation in Cold War Strategy: Kennedy proposed adjusting the Cold War strategy to avoid repeating crises like the Cuban Missile Crisis. He aimed to create a “world safe for diversity,” allowing the coexistence of opposing ideologies without direct confrontation.
– Arms Control Agreements and Constraints: Kennedy’s insights led to arms control agreements, constraints, and crisis management arrangements. Reagan’s famous quote, “A nuclear war cannot be won and must therefore never be fought,” encapsulated this approach. These constraints provided a framework for managing the US-Soviet rivalry.
– Implications for the China-US Relationship: The lessons from the Cuban Missile Crisis and Kennedy’s strategic adjustments offer insights for navigating the current China-US relationship. Establishing constraints and crisis management mechanisms can help mitigate the risks of conflict escalation. Recognizing the potential consequences of a confrontation and seeking common ground can contribute to a more stable and peaceful relationship.
Notes by: crash_function