Steven Chu (USA Secretary of Energy) – China and the Sputnik Moment in US energy Policy at the National Press Club (Dec 2010)


Chapters

00:00:00 China's Race to Innovation: A New Sputnik Moment
00:09:50 China's Rise in Science, Technology, and Innovation
00:12:44 Government Leadership for Clean Energy Innovation
00:24:08 Innovation and Energy Policy in a New Era
00:35:14 U.S. Innovation and Energy Policy in the Face of Changing Immigration and Economic
00:43:28 Energy Independence and the Future of Ethanol
00:45:44 Energy Innovations from Biofuels to Nuclear
00:48:08 Future of Nuclear Energy in the United States
00:52:44 Energy Efficiency: The Untapped Potential for Savings and Competitiveness
00:56:03 Dealing with Ignorance in Washington

Abstract

U.S. Science and Technology Leadership Under Threat: An In-Depth Analysis of Innovation and Collaboration in the Energy Sector with Supplemental Updates

The United States’ position as a global leader in science and technology is under significant pressure, especially from China’s swift progress in energy technology and innovation. In this detailed article, we delve into the key aspects of this competitive arena, drawing on insights from Steven Chu’s speech and various important reports and findings. This includes supplemental updates on the U.S.’s leadership in innovation, the challenges and opportunities for the Energy Department, and issues surrounding rare earth elements and corn ethanol. Our approach is structured in an inverted pyramid format, starting with the most crucial points and moving into more detailed background information.

Crucial Points at the Forefront

The U.S. is losing its edge in high-tech manufacturing and innovation, as evidenced by a decline in its share of global high-tech exports from 25% in 1998 to 12-13% in recent years. This decrease is in stark contrast to China, which has seen its share increase from 6% in 1995 to 20% in 2008. China’s rapid technological advancements have catapulted it from 15th to 5th in international patent ranking, leading in areas such as solar R&D, high-voltage power lines, nuclear reactors, and high-speed rail, and aiming for 18-20% of its energy from renewable sources by 2020.

The U.S. is facing a decline in global influence in education and innovation, ranking 48th in math and science education quality. Changes in immigration policy are leading to a loss of top talent in science and engineering, with the majority of Ph.D. graduates in these fields now being foreign-born. The importance of federal support for R&D is evident, as this support is crucial for maintaining the country’s economic competitiveness. This is highlighted by historical examples like the Wright brothers and the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics.

However, the energy industry has historically underinvested in R&D, with only 0.14% of the 2010 federal budget allocated to this area. The U.S. Department of Energy is now focusing on transformative technologies, including advanced electric vehicle batteries, cost-effective biofuel production, and methods for generating domestic fuel from sunlight. Steven Chu advocates for energy innovation and collaboration, particularly with rapidly developing countries like China and India, and calls for long-range energy policies and increased support for energy R&D. Concerns over climate change and energy legislation are hampering efforts to address these critical issues. Additionally, the U.S.’s heavy dependence on China for rare earth materials essential for green technologies poses a significant supply chain risk.

Detailed Analysis and Background Information

Steven Chu’s address highlights the importance of innovation in driving societal wealth and prosperity, stressing that U.S. leadership in science and technology cannot be taken for granted. He points out that technological innovation, as emphasized by Robert Solow’s Nobel Prize-winning work, is more critical than capital investments and labor growth for increasing societal productivity and wealth. The urgency of the situation is underlined by reports like “Rising Above the Gathering Storm” from 2005 and its 2010 progress report, which emphasize the need for the U.S. to invest in intellectual capital and innovation capacity to remain globally competitive.

China’s energy revolution is notable, with the country closing inefficient coal plants and investing in advanced technologies, becoming a leader in ultra-supercritical coal plants. Companies like Suntech are emblematic of China’s focus on innovation, achieving world records in solar cell efficiency. Energy Innovation Hubs and ARPA-E, inspired by historical projects like the Manhattan Project and Bell Laboratories, are focusing on developing game-changing energy technologies and replicating nature’s efficient energy processes. Chu also calls for bipartisan support for sensible, long-range energy policies.

Supplemental Updates

Chu emphasizes the importance of maintaining America’s leadership in innovation, particularly in the energy sector, and the opportunity to develop new energy technologies and create jobs. He introduces innovative research funding programs like ARPA-E and energy innovation hubs. Artificial photosynthesis, a process aiming to replicate how plants convert sunlight, water, and carbon dioxide into energy-rich fuels, is also discussed.

Chu highlights the potential for collaboration with countries like China and India, which have rapidly expanding infrastructure and energy needs. He acknowledges the historical strength of U.S. graduate programs in hard sciences and the allure of U.S. research universities in attracting international students. There’s a growing interest among young people in science and energy, particularly in addressing climate change and energy challenges.

Chu’s insights also cover the potential impact of a federal pay freeze on the Department of Energy’s ability to attract top-notch scientific talent. The DOE’s Recovery Act funds are seen as crucial for addressing energy challenges, but the future use of these funds remains uncertain. He stresses that absolute certainty is not necessary for action on climate change and highlights the economic opportunities presented by the transition to alternative energy sources.

The development of U.S. capacity for rare earth materials is critical due to China’s dominance in the mining and processing of these materials, which raises concerns about supply risks. There is a focus on mining rare earth elements (REEs) in an environmentally responsible manner, exploring alternative sources, researching more efficient use of REEs, and finding technological substitutes.

Regarding corn ethanol, there is a question about the continued need for subsidies and trade protections in the current energy climate. The DOE is focusing on developing new technologies beyond corn-based ethanol, aiming to supersede ethanol made from starches and sugars with more advanced technologies. Ethanol is seen as a good starting point but not an ideal transportation fuel, with the DOE prioritizing the development of fuels like gasoline, jet fuel, kerosene, and diesel due to their superior characteristics.

In conclusion, Steven Chu urges the U.S. to recognize the urgency of investing in energy R&D. He warns that underfunding R&D in times of austerity is akin to removing an engine from an overloaded aircraft. He highlights the need for a comprehensive plan to secure America’s future prosperity in a world facing the challenge of a new industrial revolution for clean and affordable energy.


Notes by: Hephaestus