Announcements:
Visit www.bootstrap.org/colloquium for the latest announcements, news, and discussion groups. Fill out the questionnaire forms to help improve future sessions. On-site colloquium registration is reopened due to dropouts; attendees are welcome to join. PowerPoint files from past sessions will be posted online via the OneList file sharing capability. Contact the organizers if experiencing webcast quality issues; information is available on the colloquium homepage.

Doug Engelbart’s Insights:
Coordinated efforts are essential in managing the influx of contributions to the knowledge repository. Building and running an effective dynamic knowledge repository requires practical implementation, not just research. The worldwide bootstrapping effort is a monumental undertaking, akin to a journey to the moon compared to a Boy Scout trip. Emergent technology’s involvement and impact should be considered within society’s augmentation systems. A conceptual overview of the environment’s architecture will be provided to illustrate how people can interact with technology. A push towards a takeoff position will be discussed with the help of notable speakers.

Doug Engelbart’s Introduction:
Doug Engelbart acknowledges and introduces his friend Marlene Melikot, Ted Nelson’s partner, and associates from Australia who are present at the presentation.

Paradigm Shifts and Collective Intelligence:
Engelbart discusses the impact of prevailing paradigms on how the world perceives and hears information. He emphasizes the importance of collective intelligence and knowledge integration, terming it “Kodiak.”

Open Hyper Document System:
Engelbart highlights the emergence of open hyper document systems as a key technology for supporting Kodiak. He emphasizes the need for integrating different technologies and concepts into a coherent framework.

Dynamic Knowledge Repository:
Engelbart introduces the concept of a dynamic knowledge repository as a central element of Kodiak. He explains that the repository would provide visibility and accessibility to knowledge, enabling social organisms to evolve and interact effectively.

Challenges and Opportunities:
Engelbart reflects on the challenges faced in the mid-70s when research funding dried up. He describes how the NLS system was auctioned off to a commercial company, Timeshare, leading to a new phase of development.

McDonnell Douglas Acquisition:
McDonnell Douglas acquired Timeshare, including Engelbart’s group, in a bid to expand its information services business. This provided Engelbart with an opportunity to build relationships and gain insights into the corporate world.

Prototypes and Customer Base:
Engelbart’s group developed prototypes and gained customers while at Timeshare. The Air Force explored the integration of office automation and communications, demonstrating advanced knowledge management capabilities.

Doug Engelbart’s Pitch to McDonnell Douglas:
Engelbart aimed to showcase the unique capabilities of their system but faced challenges in conveying its details. He approached the corporate vice president for information services at McDonnell Douglas, who initially showed interest but later expressed reservations.

The High-Altitude Advanced Aircraft Project:
Engelbart and his team managed to pique the interest of a group involved in a multi-corporation study on a high-altitude aircraft project. However, the corporate vice president ultimately decided against supporting their work, considering it too radical and lacking industry recognition.

Challenges in Large-Scale Collaborative Projects:
Engelbart highlighted the need for improved standards and interoperability in collective knowledge work and exchange. He emphasized the significance of knowledge containers, interlinking, following, digesting, and portraying information in complex projects involving numerous stakeholders and suppliers.

The Concept of Open Hyperdocument Systems:
Engelbart and his team proposed an open hyperdocument system to address the challenges in collaborative knowledge work. They faced accusations that McDonnell Douglas aimed to monopolize the system, prompting Engelbart to pursue early retirement.

The Bootstrap Institute:
Engelbart, along with Christina and her husband, established the Bootstrap Institute to promote the concept of open hyperdocument systems. The institute faced challenges and varying levels of interest over the subsequent eleven years.

Open Hyper-Document System Standards:
Open standards are crucial for an open hyper-document system’s evolution, allowing for organic growth without relying on vendors’ yearly releases. Open source movement is a viable approach to involve proactive users in the system’s evolution.

Importance of Standards:
Unambiguous description, naming, and usage of properties in knowledge containers are essential. Standard ways to represent properties enable seamless knowledge container exchange. Unambiguous naming and descriptions of functions applied to knowledge containers are necessary for seamless navigation, manipulation, and storage.

Vocabulary and Nomenclature:
Standard vocabulary and nomenclature for tool systems are essential for global understanding and communication. Clear and consistent definitions of objects and verbs in the system facilitate discussions and collaborations.

Historical Papers:
“A Conceptual Framework for the Augmentation of Human Intellect” (1986): Discusses the chronology of events and experiences in the development of tool systems. “The Knowledge Domain Interoperability in an Open Hyperdocument System” (1990): Emphasizes the importance of an open hyperdocument system and general groupware.

Current Views:
ABC model and open hyperdocument system are discussed, highlighting the importance of integrated editing and browsing within tools. Mixed object documents, explicit structuring of understandable things, and view control are examined using Augment’s modern version.

Human Capabilities and the Capability Infrastructure:
Human capabilities are augmented by an array of factors, such as language, customs, procedures, tools, and the environment. This results in a capability infrastructure that enables us to become more competent. Capabilities at mid-level depend on lower-level capabilities, which are involved in many higher-level capabilities. Basic human capabilities include sensory, perceptual, cognitive, and motor skills, with an important unconscious component.

The Importance of Evolution:
Different environments and technologies can lead to new ways of communicating and interacting with the world. The way we use language and express ourselves is influenced by the environments we grew up in. New technologies can provide crisper and clearer ways to access and feed back information. Aiming for an easy-to-learn and natural-to-use world is important, but it should also be evolvable. The way we introduce evolving tool systems has a significant impact on evolutionary opportunities.

Interdependence of Tool and Human Systems:
The tool system and the human system are intimately intertwined within the capability infrastructure. Significant changes in the tool system cannot be made independently without affecting the human system. An understanding of this interdependence is crucial for designing effective and impactful tools.

Evolutionary Challenges:
The co-evolution of the tool system and the human system is a complex challenge that requires attention to strategy. This co-evolution occurs not only between individuals but also between organizations, institutions, governments, and nations.

Two-Dimensional Model of Evolution:
A simplified two-dimensional model represents the evolution of the tool system and the human system. Each dimension is multi-dimensional, resulting in a complex space with many paths and potential outcomes.

The Elephant or Whale Analogy:
The “elephant or whale” analogy visualizes the hypothetical clustering of societies based on their technological advancement and human system evolution. The margin of anticipated tool system capabilities is continuously expanding.

High-Performance Teams as Outposts:
High-performance teams are proposed as outposts to explore the frontiers of tool and human system capabilities. These teams need advanced tools and knowledge containers to operate effectively within ongoing social structures.

The Role of High-Performance Teams:
High-performance teams demonstrate advanced capabilities and serve as role models for others. They use specialized tools and human system enhancements to achieve remarkable results. Their work is visible and accessible to others, fostering learning and development.

Open Hybrid Document System:
The development of an open hybrid document system is an example of implementing this co-evolutionary approach. The goal is to provide a glimpse of the potential for utilizing today’s technology to initiate this co-evolutionary process.

Human Capabilities and the Evolution of Language:
Engelbart emphasizes the importance of understanding basic human capabilities and how they have evolved over time. He discusses the role of mental structuring, concepts, and symbols in human thought and communication. Engelbart highlights the work of Benjamin Whorf on the relationship between language and worldview.

The Potential of Computers for Enhancing Human Capabilities:
Engelbart believes that computers have the potential to significantly enhance human capabilities and revolutionize the way we work and interact. He envisions a future where computers will provide us with more flexible and efficient ways to represent, manipulate, and share information. Engelbart emphasizes the need to move beyond traditional tools and explore new possibilities for human-computer interaction.

Key Features of Engelbart’s Vision for Human-Computer Interaction:
Fast concurrent control: Engelbart advocates for systems that allow users to quickly and easily manipulate content and structural relationships in real-time. Structured files and hierarchical organization: He emphasizes the importance of structured file systems and hierarchical organization to facilitate flexible manipulation and viewing of information. Integration of text and graphics: Engelbart recognizes the value of integrating text and graphics to create more comprehensive and informative representations of information. In-file naming and addressing: He introduces the concept of in-file naming and addressing, allowing users to explicitly refer to and manipulate specific objects within a file. Indirect linking: Engelbart highlights the benefits of indirect linking, enabling users to create flexible and dynamic connections between objects and navigate through complex information structures. Remote jumps and manipulations: Engelbart emphasizes the importance of remote jumps and manipulations, allowing users to quickly navigate and interact with different parts of a document or system. Optional views: He discusses the generation of optional views, providing users with different perspectives and representations of the same information. Shared screen and collaboration: Engelbart mentions the use of shared screens and collaboration tools, allowing multiple users to work together and share information in real-time.

Implementing a Digital Document Repository:
In 1970, Doug Engelbart introduced a revolutionary document management system that guaranteed the preservation and immutability of submitted documents. Documents were cataloged and linked within a repository, ensuring their integrity and accessibility over time.

Benefits of Permanent Document Storage:
Users could confidently rely on the authenticity and reliability of archived documents, as they remained unchanged from their initial submission.

Announcement System for Document Updates:
When a document was superseded, an automatic announcement was sent to relevant parties, notifying them of the updated version.

Flexible Document Viewing Options:
Users could customize their viewing preferences, specifying the level of detail, line spacing, and text display. This flexibility allowed for efficient navigation and comprehension of documents.

External Document Cataloging:
The system also tracked external documents, such as physical files and citations, providing a comprehensive view of interconnected information.

Knowledge Product (Handbook):
Engelbart envisioned a dynamic handbook that captured the current state of knowledge on various topics, arguments, and issues. This handbook was intended to be continuously updated and serve as a valuable reference tool.

Status Reporting and Macro System:
Engelbart’s system enabled the automated generation of status reports, linking them to previous reports and critical discussions. A macro system facilitated the efficient compilation and journaling of these reports.

Challenges and Resistance to Adoption:
Some users were initially hesitant to permanently store documents, fearing the consequences of making irreversible changes. Engelbart addressed this concern by temporarily restricting email communication to the journal system, encouraging users to embrace the concept of permanent documentation.

Practical Applications:
The document management system proved particularly valuable in project management, allowing teams to seamlessly collaborate and track progress. McDonnell Douglas successfully utilized the system for status reporting, demonstrating its flexibility and efficiency.

History and Orientation:
The concept of an augmented knowledge workshop involves a set of tools and materials that follow standards for effective collaboration. The evolution of workshops and the workshop utility service, offered by Engelbart’s research group in 1974, allowed ARPANET users to learn how to implement these ideas.

Open Hyperdocument System:
The evolution of an open hyperdocument system is rooted in the history and orientation of augmented knowledge workshops and co-evolution.

Application Program Functions:
Application programs have two functions: user interaction and task completion.

Front-end and Back-end Separation:
Engelbart proposes separating the front end (user interaction) and back end (task completion) of application programs.

General Front End:
A general front end allows users to interact with any application in a consistent manner.

User Interface System:
Engelbart’s system featured a separate user interface system that communicated with the server through a network.

Virtual Terminal Controller:
The virtual terminal controller handled different types of terminals by utilizing terminal characteristic files.

Challenges:
Engelbart acknowledges that the separation of front end and back end is not an easy task.

Command Language Interpreter:
The command language interpreter attached itself to a grammar file and a user profile. The grammar file defined the language and its meaning. The user profile specified the user’s preferences for language size, abbreviations, and more.

Evolution of the Language:
The language evolved over time, becoming more complex and feature-rich. Users could customize their language based on their needs. The system supported flexibility in defining nouns, verbs, and actions.

Applicability in the OpenHyper Document System:
The OpenHyper document system should incorporate similar flexibility to allow for evolution. Standard provisions within the file structure should enable users to take advantage of advanced features. Simple users can remain unaware of these features until they are ready to use them.

XML Extensions:
XML extensions to HTML documents provide a standard way to incorporate this flexibility.

Shared Screen Service:
By 1974, the two user interface systems could cross-connect, allowing multiple users to watch and control the same screen. This led to the development of shared screen services and the ability for multiple users to collaborate on documents.

Command Scripts:
With the command language interpreter, users could write command scripts to automate tasks. This enabled users with no programming experience to create complex applications.

User-Generated Accounting System:
A support person and a customer, neither of whom had accounting experience, collaborated to create a whole accounting system using command scripts.

Designing a System for Evolution:
The goal was to design a system that could evolve over time to accommodate new applications and features. The intermediate server concept allowed for interfacing with various application packages.

Web-Based Intermediary (WBI):
IBM’s Web-Based Intermediary (WBI) aligns with the idea of an intermediate server.

Background of Open Hybrid Argumentation System (OHS):
Engelbart explains the origins of the idea for an OHS. He mentions Jim Spors from IBM will provide more information about the Webby status and other related topics.

Relevance of Accessibility in OHS:
Engelbart emphasizes the significance of accessibility for handicapped people in the context of OHS. He introduces Neil Scott, who leads the Archimedes Project at Stanford, working on interfacing for handicapped individuals in computer systems.

Importance of Research on Accessibility:
Engelbart believes that research on accessibility is one of the most important ongoing endeavors in the world. He explains how it helps people with motor and sensory disabilities effectively operate computer interfaces.

Broader Implications of Accessibility Research:
Engelbart sees the potential for accessibility research to benefit everyone, not just those with disabilities. He suggests that exploring alternative ways to interact with computers can lead to more efficient and effective interfaces for everyone.

Total Access System:
Engelbart mentions a gadget called the Total Access System developed by Neil Scott’s team. It allows any motor input device to be used as a cursor-driving mouse and keyboard actuator, enabling individuals with disabilities to interact with any computer interface.

Significance of the Total Access System:
Engelbart highlights the significance of the Total Access System in providing an alternative interface for handicapped individuals. He believes it can be used by high-performance teams to experiment with various input methods to drive applications more effectively.

Overview of the Millennium Project:
The Millennium Project, initiated by the United Nations University, aims to create a capacity for humans to think together in an accumulative way. It serves as a platform for individuals, institutions, and organizations to collaborate and share knowledge on various domains, including human capacity, technological capacity, environmental change, and integration and whole futures.

Structure and Function of the Dynamic Knowledge Repository:
The Millennium Project employs a grid-based Dynamic Knowledge Repository, which consists of domains (categories) along the top and individual elements (issues, opportunities, challenges, actions, websites, questions, etc.) along the left side. By clicking on a cell in the grid, users can access information related to a specific domain and element, such as the current state of play, actions taken to address the issue, and judgments from policy makers and experts.

Data Collection and Analysis:
The Millennium Project collects data through one-on-one interviews with policy makers and experts from around the world. These interviews gather information on the actions taken to address various issues, challenges, and opportunities. The collected data is then synthesized into concise paragraphs or comments for each action.

Output and Impact:
The Millennium Project produces annual reports and publications that synthesize the collected data and provide insights into the current state of play and future trends in various domains. These reports serve as valuable resources for policy makers, researchers, and practitioners working on global issues. The project aims to contribute to informed decision-making and promote collaboration among stakeholders to address complex challenges.

Annual State of the Book Report:
The Millennium Project conducts an annual review of its research findings and presents them in a report called the State of the Book. The State of the Book report is used to inform policymakers and decision-makers about emerging trends and challenges. The report is also used to generate new research ideas and to identify areas where more research is needed.

Questionnaires and Interviews:
The Millennium Project uses a combination of questionnaires and interviews to collect data for its research. Questionnaires are used to gather information from a large number of people. Interviews are used to gather more in-depth information from a smaller number of people.

Dynamic Modeling:
The Millennium Project uses dynamic modeling to explore how different factors interact and influence each other over time. Dynamic modeling can be used to identify potential future scenarios and to assess the impact of different policy decisions.

Expanding the Millennium Project:
The Millennium Project is expanding its research efforts to include more countries and cultures. The goal is to create a truly global network of researchers who can work together to address the challenges facing humanity.

Cyber Game:
The Millennium Project is developing a cyber game that will allow people to experiment with different strategies for solving real-world problems. The game will be used to identify new ideas and to connect people with the knowledge and resources they need to make a difference in the world.

Features of the Dynamic Knowledge System:
It allows users to explore the evolution of any concept or issue by delving into its past. It provides access to various questionnaires, rating systems, and vetting processes related to the concept. It facilitates understanding of the concept’s relationship to other aspects of the world. It collects indicators to measure progress on various issues, disaggregating them regionally. It seeks to upgrade the underlying grid structure of the system to enhance its capabilities.

Influences of the Dynamic Knowledge System:
It has the potential to influence decision-making processes, as evident from the case of the UN University study on Japanese surplus for development, which led to a significant increase in Japan’s foreign assistance. The system’s one-on-one interviews with decision-makers serve as briefings, providing valuable information and insights. It incorporates mechanisms for users to transition from the open system to a professional system by completing questionnaires and contributing to the work.

Challenges and Considerations:
The system faces the challenge of managing open discussion systems, as allowing fully open discussions can lead to unconstructive behavior and interference with meaningful discussions. The system employs a list serve for project participants and a public website for self-selection, with moderation capabilities to manage inappropriate content. The system recognizes the sensitivity of decision-makers in acknowledging the influence of external studies on their decisions. The system seeks to foster a dynamic process where interviews with decision-makers serve as briefings and contribute to the overall knowledge system.